Thanks for reviewing ToddF. We agree, at first blush it may appear similar in that we match consumer requests for vendors with vendors but we`re really vastly different. Your comment does however speak volumes about our weak message identifying competetive differentiation. We have numerous patents pending which speak to how different this is in the world.
We sure appreciate the time and your service!
Thank you Linda,
Points well taken! Vendors are subtly prompted to investigate membership via hyperlinked word "affiliate" on step 3. We agree, the invitation is weak and hidden. This site has an almost singular mission to generate leads for companies who give back to charity. Our primary site www.givingcorps.com</A> explains everything in much greater detail. Maybe we should have asked people to critique that site too? Again, all concepts, systems, methods patent pending.
Comments
We sure appreciate the time and your service!
Points well taken! Vendors are subtly prompted to investigate membership via hyperlinked word "affiliate" on step 3. We agree, the invitation is weak and hidden. This site has an almost singular mission to generate leads for companies who give back to charity. Our primary site www.givingcorps.com</A> explains everything in much greater detail. Maybe we should have asked people to critique that site too? Again, all concepts, systems, methods patent pending.