WE'VE MOVED!
We are proud to announce our NEW community destination. Engage with resident experts and fellow entrepreneurs, and learn everything you need to start your business. Check out the new home of StartupNation Community at startupnation.mn.co
We are proud to announce our NEW community destination. Engage with resident experts and fellow entrepreneurs, and learn everything you need to start your business. Check out the new home of StartupNation Community at startupnation.mn.co
What is content?

Apparently, I can cast myself as one of the ignorant who don`t know what content is. Rather than just content myself with such, hopefully the people who have definitions of content can relay them. I hope spinoff threads of locked threads are kosher. If not, my apologies. Anyway, I thought content was the stuff inside whatever medium you use to convey a message. If you use conversation to convey a message, content is what you`re saying. A conversation can be devoid of content.
I can`t quote directly, but I found this Craig quote in the prior content thread. It`s what spurred on my own post in said thread, a post unintended to cause controversy."Conversation without meaning or substance isn`t interesting. Content is what makes a conversation interesting. Ergo, content is king."That`s where I got the idea that you can have a conversation without content. A conversation needs content to be interesting. Conversation is like a box, and content is what`s inside. The contents of a box. A box can be full and still have minimal content, well, unless you count air. A book can have lots of pages and have little content. Am I totally off base?Is it possible to achieve a sale or whatever, with a lot of conversation and little to no content? Can there be more conversation than content in a delivery? Does fluff and filler count as content? I think I was holding content to a higher standard. A blank page can be in the contents of a book, but the table of contents rarely lists it. When you open a box, some of its contents are air, but if air is the only thing in a box, it would be common to call it empty. For marketing purposes, is "content" every single thing that exists within a delivery framework? I wasn`t under that impression, but I think some people are. I thought "meaningful" was a silent prefix to "content" in the context we use it.
I can`t quote directly, but I found this Craig quote in the prior content thread. It`s what spurred on my own post in said thread, a post unintended to cause controversy."Conversation without meaning or substance isn`t interesting. Content is what makes a conversation interesting. Ergo, content is king."That`s where I got the idea that you can have a conversation without content. A conversation needs content to be interesting. Conversation is like a box, and content is what`s inside. The contents of a box. A box can be full and still have minimal content, well, unless you count air. A book can have lots of pages and have little content. Am I totally off base?Is it possible to achieve a sale or whatever, with a lot of conversation and little to no content? Can there be more conversation than content in a delivery? Does fluff and filler count as content? I think I was holding content to a higher standard. A blank page can be in the contents of a book, but the table of contents rarely lists it. When you open a box, some of its contents are air, but if air is the only thing in a box, it would be common to call it empty. For marketing purposes, is "content" every single thing that exists within a delivery framework? I wasn`t under that impression, but I think some people are. I thought "meaningful" was a silent prefix to "content" in the context we use it.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Comments
It is in real time: you can get the latest of anything.
It is interactive: unlike all the other media, you can talk or write back.
You can connect: for business or entertainment.
The content that appears on television is geared towards a linear communication: there is a presentation and an observer. The internet is not limited by this constraint therefor content is more free to change and adapt.
Adapt to what? A better question is : adapt to who? Because this is where it gets interesting. Some argue that it`s all content. But the traditional delivery methods are static whereas the modern internet is dynamic. So if it is all content, then how do you give form to content that is so reliant on the interactions of people?
This is, for me, the interesting question.
And now, I`ll be judgemental: you`ve got to be a closed-minded individual to be able to make statements like. "That`s absolutely wrong." or "That`s absolutley correct." Keep thinking this way and you`ll stagnate.
Casi3/17/2009 12:31 AM
on my own post in said thread, a post unintended to cause controversy.The study of Kung Fu or Tai Chi will strengthen and energize you. We invite you to watch or attend a class in our Toronto Studio. Kung Fu Toronto
law, refers to information that is provided for a hearing, usually
within a specific context. The contents may vary on the subject, scope,
detail, material and medium enterprises. Any information transmitted to
an audience can fall under the rubric of content.
Keep sharing...