We are proud to announce our NEW community destination. Engage with resident experts and fellow entrepreneurs, and learn everything you need to start your business. Check out the new home of StartupNation Community at startupnation.mn.co

Can I get a trademark on the shape of my product?

patentandtrademarkpatentandtrademark subscriber Posts: 103
edited March 2009 in Marketing

Well, maybe.  Two common problems that such trademarks run into are (1) the shape of the product is not distinctive enough – looks too much like the products of competitors, and (2) the shape of the product is functional.  How is functionality determined?  Courts use a multi-part test including things like:


(i) the existence of a utility patent, expired or unexpired, that involves or describes the functionality of an item`s design element;

(ii) the utilitarian properties of the item`s unpatented design elements;

(iii) advertising of the item that touts the utilitarian advantages of the item`s design elements;

(iv) the dearth of, or difficulty in creating, alternative designs for the item`s purpose; and

(v) the effect of the design feature on an item’s quality or cost.


In one recent case, a round rug was sold using an advertisement touting a utilitarian advantage of the round towel.  The shape of the towel permits sunbathers “to reposition their bodies in order to get direct tanning exposure from the sun without having to move the towel.”  The way the product was marketed did not help things – since the advertisement mentioned a utilitarian advantage of the towel’s shape.


The trademark holder was trying to enforce a trademark that had even become “incontestable” – but ultimately had the trademark invalidated by a federal judge.  One potential tactical error here may have been suing Walmart.  If the trademark holder had chosen a different target, a settlement might have been obtained.  Walmart has the money to fight legal battles.  Now, the trademark is effectively dead unless an appeal changes that.


Franek v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
, Civil Action No. 08-CV-0058 (N.D.


March 13, 2009

) (Reg. No. 1,502,261).


  • Options
    CasiCasi subscriber Posts: 5
    Very interesting.   Thanks.
    I mentioned in one of your other posts that I was able to trademark our company logo.  However, the Patent Office did not allow me to register the name because it decided that it was too "generic" or as you put it, not distinctinctive enough.  As proof, they sent to me a copy of a   Google search engine result.  
Sign In or Register to comment.