WE'VE MOVED!
We are proud to announce our NEW community destination. Engage with resident experts and fellow entrepreneurs, and learn everything you need to start your business. Check out the new home of StartupNation Community at startupnation.mn.co
We are proud to announce our NEW community destination. Engage with resident experts and fellow entrepreneurs, and learn everything you need to start your business. Check out the new home of StartupNation Community at startupnation.mn.co
Does this sound normal/fair?

Hi I have been offered a job with a startup and, as I have never had anything to do with startups before, I have no idea if what I am being offered is normal/fair. Gut feel is that it is, but would love some opinion from the market before I go ahead. I don't want to put a load of work in only to resent it down the line, so just checking..
The company is a media agency and has been going for a couple of years. They have decided on a particular growth strategy whereby they will create some separate companies under the existing company as a holding company. So I have been approached to start a new specialist company within this structure.
The main company is largely funded/started by the CEO, and there are 3 other board members whose equity ranges between 5-10%.
I would be the MD of the new company and equity would start at 5%, vested for 3 years, but would rise to 7.5% and then 10% but based on turnover/growth milestones, which are a stretch but not impossible. A further jump to 12.5% is possible but with pretty tough targets. I am not investing/funding anything.
This equity is only a % of the subsidiary I am founding, not the whole wider company. The remaining e.g. 90% equity goes to the holding company to be split between those founders according to their percentages (which are of the whole company)
Does this sound normal?
Whether the turnover targets are achievable is another matter; I think they are - but it's kind of a new area (nothing very much to benchmark against) so it's a bit of a leap of faith.
The company is a media agency and has been going for a couple of years. They have decided on a particular growth strategy whereby they will create some separate companies under the existing company as a holding company. So I have been approached to start a new specialist company within this structure.
The main company is largely funded/started by the CEO, and there are 3 other board members whose equity ranges between 5-10%.
I would be the MD of the new company and equity would start at 5%, vested for 3 years, but would rise to 7.5% and then 10% but based on turnover/growth milestones, which are a stretch but not impossible. A further jump to 12.5% is possible but with pretty tough targets. I am not investing/funding anything.
This equity is only a % of the subsidiary I am founding, not the whole wider company. The remaining e.g. 90% equity goes to the holding company to be split between those founders according to their percentages (which are of the whole company)
Does this sound normal?
Whether the turnover targets are achievable is another matter; I think they are - but it's kind of a new area (nothing very much to benchmark against) so it's a bit of a leap of faith.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Comments
Community Manager
StartupNation, LLC
Community Manager
StartupNation, LLC
The more I think about it, the more I realise that it is actually be a good job and career move even if there wasn't any equity.
I guess (?) if the whole company gets bought before the subsidiary has generated enough turnover to make the equity worthwhile, at least I could get employed by the new buyer to continue the growth, and possibly a new equity deal - do you have any idea how that usually works? I also imagine in that situation it would be possible to command a higher salary in order to stay on??
Community Manager
StartupNation, LLC